The U.S. Department of Commerce has issued a formal request for public comment on potential alternatives to its long-used Cohen’s d test in detecting patterns of differential pricing in antidumping investigations. This action follows a recent Federal Circuit ruling that found Commerce’s application of the d-test unreasonable when used on datasets that fail to meet critical statistical assumptions.
This item is available in full to subscribers.
To continue reading, you will need to either log in to your subscriber account, below, or purchase a new subscription.
If you are a current subscriber, and had an account on our previous site, you already have an account. If you have not yet logged into our new site, click here to reset your password.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
Please log in to continue |
