Hill Calls for Firearms Export Reforms

Posted

A group of Democratic lawmakers has called for the Commerce Department to strengthen export controls and end-use checks for firearm exports.

The letter comes as Commerce prepares for the expiration of its 90-day pause on export approvals of certain firearms and related components.   

“The number of firearms export license approvals skyrocketed when the Trump Administration transferred firearms export control authority from the State Department to Commerce…. " claims the letter to Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo from Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, and U.S. Representatives Joaquin Castro (D-Texas), Ranking Member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee’s Subcommittee on the Western Hemisphere, and Norma Torres (D-Calif.)

"While we continue to support returning all firearms export controls to the State Department, we urge the Department to incorporate the recommendations in this letter as part of its policy review in order to strengthen export controls and end-use checks,” wrote the lawmakers. 

On October 27, 2023, Commerce announced a 90-day pause of export license approvals for certain assault weapons and other firearms transferred by the Trump administration from the State Department’s jurisdiction to Commerce. That pause is scheduled to expire on January 25, 2024.

“Commerce’s decision to initiate the pause and review process was welcome, but sorely needed… new data show that from March 9, 2020 (the date of the Trump administration’s transfer) to June 30, 2023, Commerce approved nearly 25,000 firearms export licenses with a total value of $34.7 billion, or roughly $10.5 billion per year. This represents a more than $1 billion increase in the annual value of license approvals as compared to the time period when the State Department controlled these approvals,” continued the letter.

The lawmakers referenced recent reporting detailing the extent to which Commerce has worked with industry trade groups to court foreign buyers for American-made firearms, despite the Biden administration’s efforts to stem the tide of gun violence at home.

Foreign Impact

The lawmakers detailed evidence of American-made firearms contributing to violence in countries such as Thailand, El Salvador, and Mexico. They also noted “evidence to suggest that soldiers and civilian militias in Israel are using American-made semi-automatic weapons to perpetrate shocking violence against Palestinian civilians.” The risks to civilians have likely increased after the Israeli government loosened gun ownership laws, authorizing “‘temporary licensing official(s)’ with only a single day of training to approve ‘anywhere from hundreds to thousands of firearm licenses’ over a few weeks.” 

Remit to State, Interim Steps

The lawmakers called for reversing the Trump administration’s decision and returning all firearms export controls to the State Department.

However, given the seriousness and scale of the problem, the lawmakers are calling on Commerce to make significant changes in the interim to its export license approval and monitoring policies, as well as export promotion policies, including: 

  1. Recognizing in a formal policy statement that firearms are the only lethal weapons on the Commerce Control List and asserting that it is a foreign policy interest of the U.S. to restrain the global proliferation of these weapons.
  2. Publicly posting requirements for end-use certification of exported semi-automatic firearms and committing to pre- and post-shipment transparency and end-use monitoring. 
  3. Adding “crime control” to the list of criteria systematically considered by Commerce prior to approving a firearms export license. 
  4. Taking advantage of existing, comprehensive sources (such as the State Department’s International Vetting and Security Tracking-cloud system) when reviewing license applications to identify problematic proposed end users.
  5. Encouraging countries of particular concern to fully participate in the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives’ (ATF’s) eTrace system to better track the use of U.S.-sourced firearms in criminal activity and facilitating programs to develop such capacities in countries of concern.
  6. Reducing export license validity from four years to one year, particularly for destinations of concern.
  7. Systematically reviewing licenses approved for export to countries importing very high numbers of firearms and confirming the identities of end users of these weapons.
  8. Capping exports of firearms to civilian buyers, and aggressively enforcing policies prohibiting transfers to security forces with an elevated risk of human rights abuse.
  9. Capping the number of exported firearms that can be covered by any single export license, particularly for destinations of concern, and distinguishing between firearms destined for security forces of trusted allies versus civilians or commercial retailers.
  10. Ending Commerce’s involvement in the SHOT Show and other firearms export promotion activities "that can lead to, and even enable, gun violence and death abroad."
  11. Using its authority under the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 to issue all policy changes stemming from the review process as final rules to ensure prompt implementation. 

“The Commerce Department’s decision to pause new firearm export approvals and promotion is welcome news. We urge the Commerce Department to implement our recommendations in its review of its export policies, and if necessary, to extend the temporary pause as needed to reconsider its export policies as rigorously as possible,” concluded the lawmakers. 

Questions for Commerce

The lawmakers are also asking Commerce to answer a set of questions about its plans concerning export licenses by February 7, 2024. 

  1. Has Commerce consulted with external non-industry stakeholders (e.g., academics, survivors of gun violence) as part of its policy review?

  2. Will Commerce release the findings of its review publicly, including which specific policies will be changed and how? If not, why not?

  3. How long does Commerce anticipate implementing the policy changes stemming from its review this implementation process will take?

  4. How will Commerce engage with U.S. gun exporters to apprise them of the policy review’s findings and any resulting changes exporters will need to make to their pending or future applications?

Mexico Court Case Advances

The lawmaker's action comes on the heels of a U.S. appeals court decision reviving a $10 billion lawsuit by Mexico seeking to hold American gun manufacturers responsible for facilitating the trafficking of weapons to drug cartels across the U.S.-Mexico border Reuters reports

“The Mexican government should focus on bringing the Mexican drug cartels to justice in Mexican courtrooms,” said NSSF Senior Vice President and General Counsel Lawrence G. Keane told CNN, “not filing a baseless lawsuit in an American court to deflect attention from its disgraceful and corrupt failure to protect its citizens.”.

[Letter]

Comments

No comments on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here