The ruling narrows the administration’s post-IEEPA tariff playbook by holding that Section 122 cannot be used as a general-purpose substitute for the global tariffs the Supreme Court rejected in February. The immediate remedy is limited to the importer plaintiffs, but the opinion’s reasoning gives other importers a roadmap to challenge the 10 percent surcharge and puts pressure on the White House to shift to more statute-specific tools, including Section 301 or Section 232, if it wants a broader and more durable tariff regime.
This item is available in full to subscribers.
To continue reading, you will need to either log in to your subscriber account, below, or purchase a new subscription.
If you are a current subscriber, and had an account on our previous site, you already have an account. If you have not yet logged into our new site, click here to reset your password.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
Please log in to continue |
