USTR Releases Special 301 Report on IP Enforcement

Posted

China remains on the US priority watch list of countries that fail to adequately protect intellectual property rights, having actually taken some steps backward, according to the US Trade Representative’s Office.


USTR’s annual Special 301 report release last week identifies the adequacy and effectiveness of US trading partners’ protection and enforcement of intellectual property rights.


This annual report details USTR’s findings in a review of more than 100 trading partners after significant research and enhanced engagement with stakeholders.


There remain many serious concerns regarding IP protection and enforcement in the People's Republic of China, according to the report.
In 2023, the pace of reforms in the PRC remained slow. Stakeholders continue to raise concerns about implementation of the amended Patent Law, Copyright Law and Criminal Law, as well as about long-standing issues like technology transfer, trade secrets, bad faith trademarks, counterfeiting, online piracy and geographical indications.


In addition, statements by Chinese officials that tie IP rights to Chinese market dominance still raise strong concerns, USTR said. The United States continues to monitor closely the PRC’s progress in

The Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) today released its 2024 Special 301 Report on the adequacy and effectiveness of U.S. trading partners’ protection and enforcement of intellectual property (IP) rights.
 
“Many of the issues highlighted in the Special 301 Report demand collaborative efforts from our allies and partners,” said Ambassador Katherine Tai.  
 
This annual report details USTR’s findings in a review of more than 100 trading partners after significant research and enhanced engagement with stakeholders.  Key elements of the 2024 Special 301 Report include:

The report highlights progress made by trading partners to resolve and address IP issues of concern to the United States:
 

    • USTR removed the Dominican Republic from the Watch List this year for significant progress on addressing concerns with IP enforcement and transparency.  
       
    • USTR also removed Uzbekistan from the Watch List this year due to sustained progress on long-standing issues pertaining to IP protection and enforcement.  
       
  • The Special 301 review of Ukraine continues to be suspended due to Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.
     
  • USTR placed seven countries on the Priority Watch List, indicating that serious problems exist in that country with respect to IP protection, enforcement, or market access for U.S. persons relying on IP:
     
    • For example, there remain many serious concerns regarding IP protection and enforcement in the People's Republic of China (PRC).  In 2023, the pace of reforms in the PRC remained slow.  Stakeholders continue to raise concerns about implementation of the amended Patent Law, Copyright Law, and Criminal Law, as well as about long-standing issues like technology transfer, trade secrets, bad faith trademarks, counterfeiting, online piracy, and geographical indications.  Also, statements by Chinese officials that tie IP rights to Chinese market dominance still raise strong concerns.  The United States continues to monitor closely the PRC’s progress in implementing its commitments under the United States-China Economic and Trade Agreement (Phase One Agreement).
       
    • In addition, while there has been progress under the U.S.-India Trade Policy Forum in addressing certain issues with trademark infringement investigations and pre-grant opposition proceedings, numerous long-standing concerns remain.  These include inadequate IP enforcement, including high rates of online piracy, an extensive trademark opposition backlog, and insufficient legal means to protect trade secrets.  Among other things, India still needs to fully implement the WIPO Internet Treaties and to ensure that copyright statutory licenses do not extend to interactive transmissions.
       

The report also details concerns and developments in 20 countries that USTR placed on the Watch List:
 

    • For example, the report explains concerns regarding IP protection and, in particular, enforcement in Vietnam.  Vietnam has increasingly become a leading source of online piracy and currently hosts some of the most popular piracy sites and services in the world that target a global audience.  Despite having criminal laws for copyright and trademark infringement, Vietnam has almost no criminal investigations or prosecutions.
       
    • Also, Mexico needs to fully implement the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), including the obligations regarding IP with transition periods that end in 2024 and 2025.  The report also details concerns regarding the high prevalence of online piracy and counterfeit goods.

"Cross-cutting issues" highlighted in the report include:
 

      • The Report calls for adequate and effective enforcement against trademark counterfeiting,
         
      • On IP and public health, the United States continues to respect its trading partners’ rights to grant compulsory licenses in a manner consistent with the provisions of the WTO Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS Agreement) and the Doha Declaration.
         
      • The Report continues to highlight ongoing concerns related to online piracy and broadcast piracy.  Examples include concerns related to stream-ripping, illicit streaming devices and related piracy apps, cable providers distributing pirated content, and illicit Internet Protocol television (IPTV) services. 
         
      • Concerns with the European Union’s aggressive promotion of its exclusionary geographical indications (GI) policies persist.    The United States remains concerned about the proposed expansion of the EU GI system beyond agricultural products and foodstuffs to encompass non-agricultural products, including apparel, ceramics, glass, handicrafts, manufactured goods, minerals, salts, stones, and textiles. 
         
      • USTR also continues to engage trading partners to address concerns on IP protection and enforcement, including through bilateral engagement under Trade and Investment Frameworks (TIFAs) and through other mechanisms.  

 
BACKGROUND
 
The “Special 301” Report is an annual review of the global state of IP protection and enforcement.  USTR conducts this review pursuant to Section 182 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended by the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988 and the Uruguay Round Agreements Act.
 
USTR reviewed more than 100 trading partners for this year’s Special 301 Report, and placed 27 of them on the Priority Watch List or Watch List.  The Special 301 review of Ukraine has been suspended due to Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.
 
In this year’s Report, trading partners on the Priority Watch List present the most significant concerns this year regarding insufficient IP protection or enforcement or actions that otherwise limited market access for persons relying on intellectual property protection.  Seven countries are on the Priority Watch List: Argentina, Chile, China, India, Indonesia, Russia, and Venezuela.  These countries will be the subject of particularly intense bilateral engagement during the coming year.
 
Twenty trading partners are on the Watch List, and merit bilateral attention to address underlying IP problems: Algeria, Barbados, Belarus, Bolivia, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, Colombia, Ecuador, Egypt, Guatemala, Mexico, Pakistan, Paraguay, Peru, Thailand, Trinidad and Tobago, Türkiye, Turkmenistan, and Vietnam.
 
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT
 
USTR continued its enhanced approach to public engagement activities in this year’s Special 301 process.  USTR requested written submissions from the public through a notice published in the Federal Register on December 6, 2023 (Federal Register notice).  In addition, on February 21, 2024, USTR conducted a public hearing that provided the opportunity for interested persons to testify before the interagency Special 301 Subcommittee of the Trade Policy Staff Committee (TPSC) about issues relevant to the review.  The hearing featured testimony from witnesses, including representatives of foreign governments, industry, and non-governmental organizations.
 
The Federal Register notice drew submissions from 45 non-government stakeholders and 16 foreign governments.  The submissions filed in response to the Federal Register notice are available to the public online at www.regulations.gov, docket number USTR-2023-0014. 

To read the Special 301 Report, click here

 

Comments

No comments on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here